Zitat von
Luckie:
Eben:
Zitat von
Raymond Chen:
When you lock memory with VirtualLock it locks the memory into your process's working set. It doesn't mean that the memory will never be paged out. It just means that the memory won't be paged out as long as there is a thread executing in your process, because a process's working set need be present in memory only when the process is actually executing.
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ar...6/5924058.aspx Wenn Du schon von eben dort zitierst, dann aber auch den wichtigen Nachtrag nicht vergessen (gleicher Link, Hervorhebung von mir):
Zitat von
Raymond Chen:
Follow-up: I've been informed by the memory manager folks that the working set interpretation was overly conservative and that in practice, the memory that has been virtually locked won't be written to the pagefile. Of course, the other concerns still apply, so you still have to worry about the hibernation file and another process sucking the data out via ReadProcessMemory.
"Tja ja, das Ausrufezeichen... Der virtuelle Spoiler des 21. Jahrhunderts, der Breitreifen für die Datenautobahn, die k3wle Sonnenbrille fürs Usenet.
" (Henning Richter)