Subversion: ja/nein bei folgender Anforderung

[Der schöne Günther]

Mit Subversion verlassen mich langsam die Erinnerungen, aber das Redbook scheint da eigentlich doch konkret zu antworten auf deine Frage "Muss ich da 2 Branches nehmen?":

Zitat:

Most projects take a middle-of-the-road approach. They commonly insist that /trunk compile and pass regression tests at all times. A feature branch is required only when a change requires a large number of destabilizing commits. A good rule of thumb is to ask this question: if the developer worked for days in isolation and then committed the large change all at once (so that /trunk were never destabilized), would it be too large a change to review? If the answer to that question is “yes,” the change should be developed on a feature branch. As the developer commits incremental changes to the branch, they can be easily reviewed by peers.

Quelle: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/s...npatterns.html